ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: RESULTS OF A REGIONAL SURVEY OF EDUCATORS IN MYKOLAIV REGION (UKRAINE)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54662/veresen.3.2026.08

Keywords:

academic integrity, AI literacy, artificial intelligence, digital competence, in-service teacher training

Abstract

This research article presents an empirical analysis of how educators in Mykolaiv Region, Ukraine, engage with artificial intelligence tools in their professional practice. Set against the backdrop of accelerated digitalisation and the ongoing war, which together have fundamentally reshaped the conditions of schooling in the region, the study addresses the lack of empirical regional-level data on actual AI use in education. The research draws on a large-scale online survey conducted by the Mykolaiv In-Service Teacher Training Institute (MOIPPO) in March–April 2026, with a sample of 1,496 respondents representing all four administrative districts of the oblast. The survey explores the prevalence and intensity of AI tool adoption, the range of pedagogical tasks for which educators use AI, their self-assessed competence level, attitudes toward students' use of AI, and the key difficulties and challenges perceived in the integration process. The study pays special attention to the open-ended responses, which allow the reconstruction of the pedagogical discourse surrounding AI in the region – capturing practitioners' views on its potential, on the barriers they encounter in their daily work, and on the conditions under which AI can genuinely serve education rather than undermine it. Importantly, the research situates its findings within the broader normative context, including recent Ukrainian legislation on academic integrity that directly addresses AI use, and the growing international regulatory framework for artificial intelligence in education. The findings are intended to inform the design of targeted professional development programmes, the formation of institutional AI policies for schools, and further comparative research on AI adoption in education in Ukraine and in other countries affected by war.

References

Bobrytska, V. I., Krasylnykova, H. V., Beseda, N. A., Krasylnykov, S. R. & Skyrda, T. S. (2024). Shtuchnyi intelekt u vyshchii osviti Ukrainy: kompleksne doslidzhennia stavlennia steikkholderiv, ochikuvan i zanepokoien [Artificial intelligence (AI) in Ukrainian higher education. A comprehensive study of stakeholder attitudes, expectations and concerns]. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23 (1), 400–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.20 (ukr).

Boiko, A., Shevtsova, N., Yashanov, S., Tymoshchuk, O. & Parzhnytskyi, V. (2024). Vplyv intehratsii shtuchnoho intelektu na zminy v osvitnomu protsesi Ukrainy: perspektyvy ta vyklyky [The impact of the integration of artificial intelligence on changes in the education process of Ukraine: Prospects and challenges]. Revista Eduweb, 18 (1), 180–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.01.13 (ukr).

Dovhyi, S., Babiichuk, S., Davybida, L. & Biletska, M. (2024). Stavlennia vchyteliv i uchniv do vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu: vseukrainske doslidzhennia [Teachersʼ and studentsʼ attitudes towards the use of AI: all-Ukrainian research]. Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia, 104 (6), 197–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v104i6.5890 (ukr).

European Parliament and Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401689 (eng).

Holmes, W., Bialik, M. & Fadel, Ch. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign. 242 p. ISBN: 978-1-794-29370-0 (eng).

Ivaniuk, I. V. & Ovcharuk, O. V. (2022). Analiz rezultativ opytuvannia shchodo tsyfrovoi kompetentnosti vchytelia v umovakh orhanizatsii dystantsiinoho navchannia [Analysis of survey results on teachersʼ digital competence in distance learning]. Imidzh suchasnoho pedahoha, 4 (205), 101–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33272/2522-9729-2022-4(205)-101-104 (ukr).

Kryshtanovych, S., Bekh, Yu., Stadnichenko, O., Shevchenko, Zh., Maikher, V., & Liubinska, O. (2025). Osvita 4.0: rozvytok systemy osvity Ukrainy v konteksti shtuchnoho intelektu ta informatsiinykh tekhnolohii [Education 4.0: Development of the Ukrainian Education System in the context of artificial intelligence and information technologies]. Journal of Management World, 2025 (2), 315–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53935/jomw.v2024i4.927 (ukr).

Law of Ukraine «On Academic Integrity» of 18.12.2025, No. 4742-IX [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4742-20#Text (ukr).

McKinsey & Company. (2024). The state of AI in early 2024: Gen AI adoption spikes and starts to generate value. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-2024 (eng).

Miao, F. & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: UNESCO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693 (eng).

Ministerstvo tsyfrovoi transformatsii Ukrainy. Kontseptualno-referentna ramka tsyfrovoi kompetentnosti pedahohichnykh i naukovo-pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv (2021). [Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. Conceptual and reference framework for digital competence of teaching and academic staff]. Kyiv: Mintsyfra. Retrieved from: https://osvita.diia.gov.ua/uploads/1/975-dcf.pdf (ukr).

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W. & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041 (eng).

Ober, J., Matusevych, T. & Strutynska, O. (2025). From challenges to opportunities: Using ICT and AI in Ukrainian education in times of pandemic and war. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11, 100639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100639 (eng).

OECD.AI Policy Navigator [Electronic resource]. (2025). Retrieved from https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/national (Accessed: May 2026) (eng).

Tenberga, I. & Daniela, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy competencies for teachers through self-assessment tools. Sustainability, 16, 10386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310386 (eng).

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455 (eng).

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S. & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2760/115376 (eng).

Zakhar, O. H. (2024). Uplyv instrumentiv shtuchnoho intelektu na profesiinyi rozvytok pedahohiv [The artificial intelligence instruments influence on the professional development of pedagogical workers]. Veresen, 3 (102), 102–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54662/veresen.3.2024.09 (ukr).

Published

2026-10-05

How to Cite

Zaporozhchenko М. (2026). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE: RESULTS OF A REGIONAL SURVEY OF EDUCATORS IN MYKOLAIV REGION (UKRAINE). Methodological and Educational Journal., 110(3). https://doi.org/10.54662/veresen.3.2026.08

Issue

Section

Статті