EFFICIENCY OF LITERARY COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS BY ICT MEANS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54662/veresen.1.2021.02Keywords:
Keywords: analysis of art pieces; conscious perception; information and communication technologies (ICT); experiment; literary competence (LC); practical tasks; project activity.Abstract
The article actualizes the need for qualitative changes in education, changes in teaching Literature within the new strategy for training graduates of general education schools. The contradictions between teachers' use of traditional methods of teaching and the need for innovation; retransmission of knowledge and independent acquisition of information on the subject, its transformation and representation; the occasional use of Project training, a synergistic approach and a competence-activity paradigm for participants in the educational process are clarified. The content and essence of the concept "literary competence" (LС) of student-readers is deepened. Functions, criteria, and key components of high school students' Literature Competence development are proposed. A methodological model for the development of students' literary competence using ICT tools is designed.
The results of experimental training of high school students in quantitative and qualitative aspects regarding the acquisition of LC by students are revealed, and the influence of the use of ICT tools on literary competence development is justified. The results of an experimental study are summarized, they prove the effectiveness of the developed model for the LC of high school students by means of ICT, and the importance of applying project-based training.
UDC 373.5.091:821.161.2:004.42
References
REFERENCES
Bibik, N. M. & Kremen, V. H. (Ed.). (2008). Kompetentnist u navchanni. Entsyklopediia osvity [Competence in learning. Encyclopedia of Education]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter (ukr).
Fasolia, A. M. (2012). Literaturna osvita : kompetentsii, kompetentnosti, znannia, uminnia i navychky [Literary education: competencies, competencies, knowledge, skills and abilities]. Ukrainska literatura v zahalnoosvitnii shkoli, 6–7, 26–32 (ukr).
Hutorskoj, A. V. (2001). Sovremennaja didaktika [Modern didactics]. SPb: Piter (rus).
Jacenko, T. A. (2012). Razvitie literaturnoj kompetentnosti uchenikov v processe izuchenija hudozhestvennoj nacional’noj literatury v obshheobrazovatel’nyh shkolah Ukrainy [Development of literary competence of students in the process of studying national fiction literature in general education schools of Ukraine]: materialy Mezhdunarodnoj zaochnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konf., 27.11.2012 g. Chast’ I. Novosibirsk: SibAK, 36–45 (rus).
Jakimanskaja, I. S. (1996). Lichnostno-orientirovanoe obuchenie v sovremennoj shkole [Personal-oriented learning in a modern school]. Moskva: Sentjabr’ (rus).
Law Of Ukraine vid 21.09.2017, 38–39, st. 380. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ 2145–19 (ukr).
Lerner, I. Ya. (1971). Dydaktychni osnovy formuvannia piznavalnoi samostiinosti 30 uchniv pry vyvchenni humanitarnykh dystsyplin [Didactic foundations of the formation of cognitive independence of students in the study of Humanities]. (Extended abstract of doctor’s thesis). Moskva (ukr).
Nebelenchuk, I. O. (2011). Dialohovi tekhnolohii navchannia zarubizhnoi literatury uchniv 5–7 klasiv [Dialogue technologies of teaching foreign literature to students of 5–7 grades]. (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis). Natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Kyiv (ukr).
Piekhota, O. M., Kiktenko, A. Z., Liubarska, O. M. & et al. (2001). Osvitni tekhnolohii [Educational technologies]. Kyiv: A.S.K. (ukr).
Selevko, G. K. (2005). Jenciklopedija obrazovatel’nyh tehnologij [Encyclopedia of educational technologies]. V 2-h t. T. 1. Moskva: Narodnoe obrazovanie (rus).
Shklovska, O. N. (2007). Formuvannia chytatskoi kompetentsii starshoklasnykiv u protsesi vyvchennia zarubizhnoi literatury [Formation of reading competence of high school students in the process of studying foreign literature]. (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis). [Zaporizkyi natsionalnyi universytet]. Kyiv (ukr).
Shuliar, V. I. (2009). Suchasnyi urok literatury [Modern lesson of literature]. Kharkiv: Osnova (ukr).
Shuliar, V. I. (2015). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady suchasnoho uroku ukrainskoi literatury v osnovnii i starshii shkoli [Theoretical and methodological principles of the modern lesson of Ukrainian literature in primary and secondary school]. (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis). Kherson (ukr).
Sytchenko, A. L. (2004). Navchalno-tekhnolohichna kontseptsiia literaturnoho analizu [Educational and technological concept of literary analysis]. Kyiv: Lenvit (ukr).
Tokman, H. L. (2003). Vikova psykholohiia yak naukove dzherelo metodyky vykladannia literatury [Age psychology as a scientific source of methods of teaching literature]. Dyvoslovo, 6, 26–29 (ukr).
Ushynskyi, K. D. (1983). Liudyna yak predmet vykhovannia. Sproba pedahohichnoi antropolohii [A person as a subject of Education. An attempt at pedagogical anthropology]. Vybr. Tvory. T. 1. Kyiv: Rad. Shk. (ukr).
Yatsenko, T. A. (2012). Formuvannia kompetentnisnoho chytacha na urokakh literatury v osnovnii shkoli [Formation of a competent reader in Literature lessons of primary school]. Ukrainska literatura v zahalnoosvitnii shkoli, 5, 8–10 (ukr).
Braun, Е., Leidner, B. Academic course evaluation theoretical and empirical distinctions between self Rated gain in competences and satisfaction with teaching behavior / Braun Е., Leidner B. // Eur. Psychol, 2009. – № 14. – Р. 297–306 (eng).
Braun, E. Selfrated competences questionnaires from a design perspective / Braun E. et al. ; Educ. Res. Rev, 2012. – № 7. – Р. 1–18. DOI: 10.1016 / j.edurev.2011.11.005 (eng).
Estriegana, Rosa Valdehita, Medina-Merodio, José-Amelio and Barchino Plata Roberto. Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model, Computers & Education, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010, 2019. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22056 (eng).
Freeman, C., Soete, L. Developing science, technology and innovation indicators : What we can learn from the past / Freeman C., Soete L. // Research Policy, 2009. – Vol. 38. – № 4. – P. 583–589 (eng).
Kwok, Wing Lai, Kian, Sam. Hong Technology use and learning haracteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? / Kwok Wing Lai, Kian Sam 31
