FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT AS A TOOL FOR ENHANCING STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION TO LEARN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54662/veresen.1.2026.01Keywords:
educational process, feedback, formative assessment, learning activity, motivation, reflection, self-assessment, toolsAbstract
The scientific and methodological article argues for the effectiveness of formative assessment as a tool for enhancing students’ motivation to learn in the context of implementing the principles of the New Ukrainian School. The relevance of the study stems from the gap between the policy-mandated requirement to apply formative assessment and the limited use of its motivational potential in pedagogical practice. The study analyzes scholarly approaches distinguishing between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. It outlines the role of assessment in fostering a supportive psychological climate, developing cognitive interest, promoting learner autonomy, and strengthening students’ reflective skills. Particular attention is given to the functions of assessment. The article demonstrates that, when applied in a pedagogically balanced manner, assessment is capable of integrating external and internal motivational factors, ensuring continuous feedback, timely identification of learning difficulties, and adjustment of educational activities. Based on the analysis of scientific publications and practical experience, criteria for selecting formative assessment tools are identified. These tools ensure cognitive interest and a positive emotional state of students, correspond to their age and psychological needs. They further promote the development of reflection, autonomy, transparency of assessment, and interaction among teachers, students, and parents. The article provides practical examples of implementing formative assessment tools in natural science education, focusing on self-assessment, awareness of personal progress, and fostering long-term learning motivation. Prospects for further research are associated with the development, testing, and systematization of formative assessment tools within the field of natural science education.
References
Byrka, M. F., Skrypska, H. V. & Kachurovska, L. M. (2023). Peredumovy efektyvnoho vprovadzhennia formuvalnoho otsiniuvannia u bazovii serednii osviti [Prerequisites for the effective implementation of formative assessment in basic secondary education]. Chernivtsi, 66–74 (ukr).
Khutchenko, I. V. (2024). Suchasni tsyfrovi tekhnolohii dlia realizatsii formuvalnoho otsiniuvannia na urokakh matematyky [Modern digital technologies for implementing formative assessment in mathematics lessons], 2, 82–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31652/3041-2277-2024-2-82-94 (ukr).
Lokshyna, O. I. (2009). Zmist shkilnoi osvity v krainakh Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: teoriia i praktyka (druha polovyna ХХ – pochatok ХХI st.) [The content of school education in the countries of the European Union: theory and practice (second half of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century)]. Kyiv: SPD Bohdanova A. M., 223–224 (ukr).
Maliar, L. V. & Vakolia, Z. M. (2021). Osoblyvosti motyvatsii uchniv do navchalnoi diialnosti [Features of students' motivation for educational activities]. Naukovyi chasopys Natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 5: Pedahohichni nauky: realii ta perspektyvy, 82., 102–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-nc.series5.2021.82.22 (ukr).
Metodychni rekomendatsii shchodo osoblyvostei orhanizatsii osvitnoho protsesu u pershomu (adaptyvnomu) tsykli / 5 klasakh zakladiv zahalnoi serednoi osvity za Derzhavnym standartom bazovoi serednoi osvity v umovakh realizatsii kontseptsii «Nova ukrainska shkola»: lyst Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrainy vid 06.08.2021. [Methodological recommendations on the features of organizing the educational process in the first (adaptive) cycle / 5 grades of general secondary education institutions according to the State Standard of Basic Secondary Education in the context of implementing the «New Ukrainian School» concept: letter from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 06/08/2021]. Retrieved from: https://osvita.ua/doc/files/news/834/83419/Metodychni-rekomendatsiyi-pilotnym-shkol.pdf (ukr).
Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 02/08/2024 № 1093 «On approval of recommendations for assessing learning outcomes». Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1093729-24#Text (ukr).
Pohromska, H. S., Makhrovska, N. A. & Rohozhynska, E. K. (2021). Oboviazkova derzhavna pidsumkova atestatsiia z matematyky – vymoha chasu chy zaive navantazhennia na uchniv ta vchyteliv [Mandatory state final certification in mathematics – a time requirement or an unnecessary burden on students and teachers]. Veresen, 4 (91), 67–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54662/veresen.4.2021.07 (ukr).
Scriven, M. The methodology of evaluation. In: R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. 1967. Vol. 1. P. 39–83 (eng).
Teletska, A. O. (2021). Poniattia pro navchalnu motyvatsiiu v psykholoho-pedahohichnii literaturi [The concept of learning motivation in psychological and pedagogical literature]. 100–102. Retrieved from: https://jpvs.donnu.edu.ua/article/view/7238 (ukr).
Tretiakova, A. O. (2023). Motyvatsiia uchniv 5–6 klasiv na urokakh matematyky v protsesi formuvalnoho otsiniuvannia [Motivation of 5th–6th grade students in mathematics lessons during formative assessment]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Bohdana Khmelnytskoho. Seriia: «Pedahohichni nauky», 4, 128–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31651/2524-2660-2023-4-128-133 (ukr).
Yamborak, R. S. (2025). Zaporuka uspishnoho navchannia khimii cherez instrumentarii formuvalnoho otsiniuvannia [The key to successful chemistry teaching through formative assessment tools]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Pedahohichni nauky», 109, 14–120 (ukr).
Yaroshenko, O. G., Korshevniuk, T. & Vashchenko, L. (2024) Formative assessment as a factor in modernizing the teaching natural science subjects. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 1 (78), 56–73 (eng).
